Three Teams. Two Countries. Four Weeks. No Budget.

​Twelve young people in Tanzania and Pakistan spent four weeks this summer running a community experiment they chose themselves.

​No budget, no institutional permission, no payment in advance.

​Their work was marked on 18 September by five reviewers with licence to attack it, against a published scoring guide. Four were from outside the programme. Half the marks went to how a team behaved rather than to what its numbers said, and thirty of them to how honestly it handled its own evidence.

​This is the session where all of it becomes public.

​What you will see.
What the teams made. The evidence, including the parts that did not work. All three teams in their own words.

​What we are not claiming.
Community impact. Two of the three teams took no baseline and cannot now produce one.

​What we can show is capability: twelve young people who got measurably better at handling evidence, fully documented for one team and partially for the other two.

​Who it is for.
Anyone who designs programmes, runs transformations, teaches, or signs off on evidence somebody else produced.

​One hour, online. Come with a hard question, it is the most useful thing you can bring.