Who Picks the Arbitrator: You or the Algorithm?

​Should parties and institutions rely on AI to select arbitrators? Can algorithms promote neutrality, diversity, and efficiency - or do they risk entrenching bias and eroding trust?

​Structured as a mock arbitration hearing, this dynamic session hosted by JAMS and Jus Mundi on Thursday, February 11th features:

• ​Counsel advocating for AI-assisted arbitrator selection

• ​Counsel opposing the proposition

• ​A three-member tribunal that will examine both positions and deliver a non-binding opinion

​Audience members won’t just observe, but participate, challenge assumptions, and help shape the debate in real time.

​This hearing-style format will probe what is gained (and what may be lost) when we let algorithms shape arbitration’s most human decisions.

​Event Details:
📍JAMS - One Biscayne Tower, First Floor Conference Center, 2 South Biscayne Blvd., Miami, FL 33131
📅 Wednesday, February 11, 2026
🕔 5:30 PM Doors Open
💬 6:30 PM Program
🍷 7:30 PM Reception

​Speakers:

• ​Moderator: Giuseppe de Palo, Independent Arbitrator, JAMS – New York.

• ​Tribunal:

  • ​William Hill, Shareholder, Gunster - Miami

  • ​Annie Lespérance, FCIArb, Head of Americas, Jus Mundi

  • ​Patricia Thomson, Arbitrator, JAMS Miami (Chair)

• ​Counsel Advocating for AI-Assisted Arbitrator Selection:

  • ​Robert Mahari, Associate Director, Stanford Code X Center – Palo Alto

  • ​Maria Lucia Echandia, Senior Associate, Hogan Lovells - Miami

• ​Counsel Opposing the Motion:

  • ​Enrique Molina, Senior Associate, White & Case – Miami

  • ​Sarah Reynolds, FCIArb, Partner & Head of International & Domestic Arbitration, Kaplan & Grady - Chicago