

Who Picks the Arbitrator: You or the Algorithm?
*We extend our appreciation for the support provided for this event by The Florida Bar International Law Section and the Miami International Arbitration Society (MIAS)
Should parties and institutions rely on AI to select arbitrators? Can algorithms promote neutrality, diversity, and efficiency - or do they risk entrenching bias and eroding trust?
Structured as a mock arbitration hearing, this dynamic session hosted by JAMS and Jus Mundi on Thursday, February 11th features:
Counsel advocating for AI-assisted arbitrator selection
Counsel opposing the proposition
A three-member tribunal that will examine both positions and deliver a non-binding opinion
Audience members won’t just observe, but participate, challenge assumptions, and help shape the debate in real time.
This hearing-style format will probe what is gained (and what may be lost) when we let algorithms shape arbitration’s most human decisions.
Event Details:
📍JAMS - One Biscayne Tower, First Floor Conference Center, 2 South Biscayne Blvd., Miami, FL 33131
📅 Wednesday, February 11, 2026
🕔 5:30 PM Doors Open
💬 6:30 PM Program
🍷 7:30 PM Reception
Speakers:
Moderator: Giuseppe de Palo, Independent Arbitrator, JAMS – New York.
Tribunal:
William Hill, Shareholder, Gunster - Miami
Annie Lespérance, FCIArb, Head of Americas, Jus Mundi
Patricia Thomson, Arbitrator, JAMS Miami (Chair)
Counsel Advocating for AI-Assisted Arbitrator Selection:
Robert Mahari, Associate Director, Stanford Code X Center – Palo Alto
Maria Lucia Echandia, Senior Associate, Hogan Lovells - Miami
Counsel Opposing the Motion:
Enrique Molina, Senior Associate, White & Case – Miami
Sarah Reynolds, FCIArb, Partner & Head of International & Domestic Arbitration, Kaplan & Grady - Chicago