

Introducing SURGE™: The 5-Part Framework for Proving AI Engineering ROI
Your engineering org adopted AI coding tools fast and their invoices scaled faster. And now the questions are landing: the CFO wants ROI, not adoption, and you want more token budget. The board wants proof, not promises. The usage dashboards cannot answer either of them.
This live session brings together the people behind SURGE™, Hivel's framework for measuring the ROI of AI in software engineering, built on DORA and SPACE. No recycled adoption stats, no vendor pitch. A working walkthrough of how to measure what your AI investment actually returns, and a live Q&A where the hard questions are welcome.
What we'll cover in a nutshell: How to walk into your next renewal or board meeting with a defensible answer instead of a vibe.
The measurement gap: why usage dashboards can't tell you what your AI spend actually shipped.
The SURGE™ framework: Spend, Utilization, Recovery, Gains, Efficiency: one question each.
Where the money goes: the waste patterns hiding in your org, idle seats, wrong models, overlapping tools, over-committed contracts.
Measuring what survives: why merged code is not durable code, and what AI speed costs downstream.
Who this is for
CTOs, VPs of Engineering, and Directors accountable for AI tooling outcomes. CFOs and finance partners who own the AI line item. Platform and DevEx leaders running the rollout.
Speakers
Sudheer Bandaru
Founder & CEO, Hivel. Author of the SURGE™ framework. Sudheer works with engineering leaders across hundreds of organizations on one question: is the engineering system, now amplified by AI, actually converting effort into shipped output?
Nathen Harvey
DORA lead, Google Cloud. Nathen leads DORA, the research program behind the industry's most widely used measures of software delivery performance, and co-authored the SURGE™ paper, which extends DORA and SPACE to the economics of AI.