

Hosts: Junfan Zhu, Aurora Feng
discord.gg/WH7DrTHRXK
πΎ IROS 2026 x Saturday Robotics x FAIR Plus β Robotics Research Night | Reading Club 31. Pittsburgh 9/28
βπΎ IROS 2026 x Saturday Robotics x FAIR Plus β Robotics Research Night | Reading Club 31. Pittsburgh 9/28
βπ
Monday, September 28
π 5:30 PM β 9:30 PM
π Pittsburgh, PA (walking distance from David L. Lawrence Convention Center)
βAbout Event
βAfter a full day of technical sessions at IROS 2026, join Saturday Robotics for an evening of high-signal technical discussions, lightning talks, and networking with researchers, founders, engineers, investors, and students building the future of robotics.
βSaturday Robotics has become one of Silicon Valley's largest community-driven robotics research groups, bringing together researchers from Google DeepMind, NVIDIA, Stanford, UC Berkeley, CMU, MIT, Physical Intelligence, Tesla, Figure, Agility Robotics, Skild AI, Boston Dynamics, and many leading robotics startups.
βSupport Saturday Robotics Inc: https://donate.stripe.com/28EcN52rjgeY1fJboYgEg00
βThis event is brought to you by FAIR Plus, our title sponsor. FAIR Plus is an annual trade exhibition and technology exchange platform held in Shenzhen, China, focusing on artificial intelligence, hardware development, and robotics. Their upcoming exhibition is April 21-23, 2027.
βWhether you're presenting at IROS, recruiting collaborators, building a startup, or simply interested in meeting others working on Physical AI, we'd love to see you in Pittsburgh.
βAgenda
βπ 5:30 PM β 6:00 PM
Doors Open & Happy Hour Networking
βGrab a drink, meet fellow attendees, reconnect with old friends, and make new ones before the technical sessions begin.
βπ 6:00 PM β 7:30 PM
Lightning Talk 1
βLizhi(Gary) Yang is a Ph.D. candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Caltech, advised by Professor Aaron Ames in the AMBER Lab. Lizhiβs research focuses on humanoid robotics, robot safety, and learning-based control.
βToday, He will present PAC-MAN, a framework that combines onboard perception, reinforcement learning, and control barrier functions to teach humanoid robots to dodge incoming objects while staying balanced. The work explores how perception and safety must be designed together for fast, whole-body robot reactions.
βhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28623v1
βPAC-MAN: Perception-Aware CBF-RL for Whole-Body Safety in Humanoid Dodgeball presents a perception-aware reinforcement learning framework designed to improve the safety and robustness of humanoid robots operating in dynamic environments. The work combines Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) with reinforcement learning and realistic onboard perception, addressing a key challenge in robot learning: policies can achieve impressive performance but may behave unsafely when exposed to unexpected disturbances or imperfect observations.
The system is demonstrated on a Unitree G1 humanoid robot performing a dynamic dodgeball task. During deployment, the robot relies only on proprioception and depth information from a head-mounted RGB-D camera. A segmentation model isolates the incoming ball from the depth image, creating a compact perception representation that closely matches the training setup. This design reduces the sim-to-real gap and allows the learned policy to operate without additional fine-tuning.
PAC-MAN introduces two levels of CBF-based safety guidance. Link-CBF represents collision clearance for every robot body link, rather than protecting only the torso. The safety constraint is incorporated into the training reward, encouraging the policy to learn collision-free behavior directly. Importantly, no runtime safety filter is required during deployment. Joint-CBF, meanwhile, provides stronger guidance through joint-space constraints and can serve as a privileged safety filter during training or evaluation, although its effectiveness depends strongly on accurate perception of the approaching object.
The framework also incorporates an adversarial human-motion prior, encouraging natural evasive behaviors such as ducking, sidestepping, leaning, and jumping. In real-world experiments, the G1 successfully dodged 19 of 20 throws (95%) with zero falls, while using onboard perception and no policy fine-tuning. The results demonstrate that integrating perception-aware safety constraints directly into robot learning can produce more robust, transferable, and deployment-ready whole-body behaviors for humanoid robots.
βLightning Talk 2
βAaron Li (Rhoda AI, Robot Data System Lead, Research Member of Technical Staff)
βHow in-context learning is reshaping robot learning data at scale.
βLightning Talk 3
βX2Real: an eXtensive simulation benchmark for real-world generalist policies
βLiangwang Ruan, X Square Robot, Simulation Tech Lead
βGeneralist robot manipulation policies have developed rapidly, yet their reliable evaluation remains challenging due to fundamental flaws in existing simulation benchmarks: prominent sim-to-real gaps, narrow task coverage, and unfair evaluation caused by ambiguous training-test pipelines. Prior works only partially resolve these issues and lack simultaneous faithfulness, diversity, and fairness, while static benchmark designs fail to sustain long-term policy development. We presents X2Real, an evolvable simulation benchmark for faithfully evaluating the real-world performance of robotic manipulation policies. Following three core principlesβfaithfulness, diversity, and fairnessβX2Real calibrates simulation visual and physical properties to align with real hardware, achieving a 0.84 linear correlation between simulated and real-robot evaluation results. It features a comprehensive taxonomy with 10 capability dimensions and 44 hierarchical long-horizon tasks, covering basic manipulation skills and advanced capacities such as visual grounding, language understanding, and bimanual control. We further adopt multi-axis domain randomization and strictly disjoint training-evaluation pipelines to mitigate benchmark exploitation and ensure credible evaluation. Powered by a custom physical domain-specific language, the Mana simulation ecosystem supports modular task design and iterative performance analysis, alongside a nearly 300-hour annotated simulation trajectory dataset. X2Real offers a faithful, diverse, and fair evolving evaluation infrastructure, effectively bridging the sim-to-real evaluation gap and supporting the advancement of generalist robotic manipulation policies.
βLightning Talk 4
βRethinking Generalist Robotic Manipulation: Architecture, Data and Inference for Real-World Deployment
βPeiyan Li (Chinese Academy of Sciences)
βGeneralist robotic manipulation is largely limited by heavy data reliance and saturated training paradigms, with conventional VLA models struggling to generalize reliably in real daily scenarios. This work advances generalist manipulation along two core directions. First, we propose a series of optimized 3D VLA architectures, memory-augmented designs and motion-based representation learning. These architectural innovations greatly reduce the demand for expensive robot teleoperation data, leveraging standalone ego and UMI human interaction priors to achieve more robust generalization and long-horizon manipulation. Second, we explore real-world model scaling with large-scale robotic pre-training. Our extensive experiments reveal the inherent limitations of simulation benchmarks for real-robot generalization. Beyond offline scaling, we further empower policies via inference-time contextual learning and closed-loop correction, showing that inference intelligence substantially lifts real-world performance without retraining. Together, our architecture-efficient and scaling-aware paradigms pave a practical path toward deployable everyday robotic manipulation systems.
βLightning Talk 5
βHiRE: Hindsight Reward Editing for Policy Finetuning (CoRL 2026 accepted)
βHaoyi Niu (UC Berkeley)
βPre-trained robot policies always require finetuning to adapt to specific environments. Reinforcement Learning (RL) offers high performance potential because it improves action optimality rather than simply mimicking data. However, such potential depends heavily on reward quality. Sparse rewards lack process feed- back, human-designed rewards are costly and biased, and semantic rewards from foundation representations are often not control-centric. We propose Hindsight Reward Editing (HiRE), a training-free framework to break this reward bottle- neck. HiRE bridges the broad knowledge of foundation representation models with physical control awareness, by contrasting successful and failed trajectories in hindsight. It calibrates foundation representation models by identifying "trap states" that are predicted as high-rewarding states yet eventually result in failure, and vice versa. HiRE explicitly penalizes these traps while boosting rewards for critical successful states. This approach can be flexibly compatible with any foundation representations and RL algorithms. Experiments show that HiRE consistently outperforms other reward recipes by delivering dense, control-aware feedback that prevents value function collapse and reward hacking, thereby achieving superior sample efficiency, stable policy updates, and higher performance ceilings, e.g., at least 3Γ performance of the base policies.
βLightning Talk 6
βWe're opening a limited number of community lightning talk slots.
β~10 minutes each
βResearch-focused and technical
βA few slides are sufficient
βFrontier papers, new projects, open problems, practical lessons, demos, or startup technical insights
βTopics include (but are not limited to):
βWorld Models
βPhysical AI
βHumanoid Robotics
βVision-Language-Action Models
βRobot Foundation Models
βRobot Learning
βManipulation
βReinforcement Learning
βSimulation & Sim-to-Real
βSpatial Intelligence
βComputer Vision
βEmbodied AI
βπ£ Call for Lightning Talks
βInterested in speaking?
βPlease email junfanzhu98@gmail.com with:
βTalk title
βAbstract
βName & affiliation
βRelevant links (arXiv paper, GitHub, slides, blog, etc.)
βPriority will be given to technically deep talks that encourage hot takes & discussion within the robotics research community.
βπ’ 7:30 PM β 8:00 PM
Open Discussion & Paper Roundtable
βBring a paper you'd like to highlight!
βWe'll host informal roundtable discussions (approximately 10β20 minutes per topic) where participants can briefly introduce recent papers, explain why they matter, and discuss technical ideas, implementation details, open questions, and future directions.
βEveryone is welcome to start a discussion.
βπ 8:00 PM β 9:30 PM
Happy Hour & Networking
βContinue conversations over food and drinks with fellow researchers, founders, students, and engineers.
βWho Should Join?
βAnyone attending IROS interested in:
βPhysical AI
βWorld Models
βHumanoid Robotics
βRobot Learning
βVision-Language-Action Models
βEmbodied Foundation Models
βManipulation
βReinforcement Learning
βSimulation & Digital Twins
βSpatial Intelligence
βWhether this is your first Saturday Robotics event or you've attended one of our Reading Clubs before, everyone is welcome.
βAbout Core Matter
βCore Matter is a newsletter focusing on the full Physical AI stack and supply chain. It analyzes the economics, hardware component and deployment economics through company filings.
βJoin the Community
βSupport Saturday Robotics Inc: https://donate.stripe.com/28EcN52rjgeY1fJboYgEg00
β
βπ¬ Join our Discord Community
Join Discord Server
βπ Follow Saturday Robotics on X
saturdayrobotic
βSubscribe to Core Matter:
https://corematter.substack.com
ββ οΈ Space is limited. Please RSVP so we can estimate attendance.
βLooking forward to meeting everyone at IROS 2026 in Pittsburgh!
Hosts: Junfan Zhu, Aurora Feng
discord.gg/WH7DrTHRXK