Disrupt the Supreme Court: What, Like It’s Hard? A Harvard Law Debate on Supreme Court Appointments

​The Supreme Court has become the ultimate political battleground. Nine justices with lifetime appointments who can decide the fate of healthcare, elections, gun rights, and more. But should the way we pick and seat those justices stay the same? Or is it time to disrupt the system itself?

​Two Harvard Law graduates diametrically opposed in their views will square off on whether the Court’s make-up and appointment process should be changed. Should we expand the number of justices, impose term limits, or rethink the nomination process entirely? Or does tampering with the structure risk undermining the Court’s legitimacy even further?

​Join Unmuted for a high-stakes debate that cuts to the heart of American democracy. Expect sharp arguments, audience Q&A, and the kind of candid back-and-forth you won’t find on cable news.