PK NCA in Practice: Same Study, Every Choice Compared, Live (8 am ET)

​PK analysis is subjective. The job is to justify your choice.

​A GLP lab and our Head of Pharmacology analysed the same study with two accepted AUC methods. The results were 50% apart. Neither was wrong. What a reviewer asks is why you chose what you chose.

​In one hour, live on Zoom, Jason W. Boggs takes one NCA study and changes one analysis choice at a time: the terminal-phase points, the AUC method, values below the limit, outliers. You see how far each one moves the result, side by side, and how to defend the one you report. Then he runs the same analysis by asking the KinetixFlow™ AI assistant: it suggests settings and explains its reasoning; the engine does the calculations; the scientist approves every step. Live Q&A for the last 15 minutes.

​For anyone who runs, reviews or signs off NCA results, in pharma, biotech, CROs, bioanalytical labs or academia.

​This is the morning session: Thursday, November 19, 8:00 am ET (1 pm London, 6:30 pm India). The same session runs again at 2:00 pm ET; register for that one here: https://luma.com/grcta1k1

​Sign-up takes 30 seconds: name and email. We confirm within a few hours, and the Zoom link is in the confirmation.

​Hosted by DeepkinetiX, the company behind KinetixFlow™.