![Cover Image for [EU/US] Mutual Heating in Solar Farm Cables](https://images.lumacdn.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=cover,dpr=2,background=white,quality=75,width=400,height=400/uploads/1g/03f9dabd-3164-437b-987d-56cc01d24270.jpg)
![Cover Image for [EU/US] Mutual Heating in Solar Farm Cables](https://images.lumacdn.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=cover,dpr=2,background=white,quality=75,width=400,height=400/uploads/1g/03f9dabd-3164-437b-987d-56cc01d24270.jpg)
[EU/US] Mutual Heating in Solar Farm Cables
Join us for a 1-hour technical webinar on how mutual heating affects cable ratings in solar farms when multiple circuits share a single duct. This free session is for power and cable engineers designing solar PV, BESS, and other LV/MV installations where bundling circuits into a shared conduit is standard practice.
Solar farms often run several DC circuits through one duct to save on trenching and materials. But each circuit heats the others, and IEC 60287 doesn’t cover multiple circuits in a duct. No standard gives correction factors for it either, so engineers either guess a derating or oversize the cable. This webinar shows a better way: a finite element (FEM) model that captures the mutual heating between circuits and the air circulating inside the duct.
We'll work through a real case: 12 DC solar circuits (1.5 kV, 240 mm² copper) in four HDPE ducts. The usual isothermal ground-surface assumption gives ~243 A per circuit. Allowing for how the ground surface really heats up drops this to 208 A, about 14% lower, a gap a standard calculation would miss. Then we show how a cyclic (daily solar) load profile wins back capacity, raising the permissible peak to ~287 A.
What You'll Learn
➤ Why the Standards Stop Short
Where IEC 60287 and IEC 62930 leave you when circuits share a duct, and why FEM is needed.
➤ How Many Circuits per Duct, and Where the Penalty Comes From
How ampacity falls as you add circuits (from 427 A with one circuit to 244 A with five, a 43% drop), and why the biggest drop comes at low-to-moderate fill.
➤ Arrangement Matters
Spread out vs bunched in the centre vs resting at the bottom: how each layout changes the rating (crowding costs ~8%), and why the most common real-world case is also one of the worst.
➤ Ground Surface Assumptions
Why the usual isothermal assumption can overstate ampacity for shallow-buried cables, and how to model it more realistically.
➤ Cyclic Rating for Solar Loads
Applying IEC 60853 to a midday-peaking PV profile to avoid oversizing: a cyclic rating factor of 1.38 lifts the permissible peak 38% above the steady-state rating.
Why You Should Attend
If your solar farm design places more than one circuit in a duct, the standards won’t provide a rating for that configuration. This session provides a defensible method and highlights the inputs that matter most.
Event Details
Eligible for Continuing Professional Development (CPD) points.
Certificate of participation provided upon completion of the post-webinar survey.
Duration: 1 hour, including live Q&A.
Presenters: Jayson Patrick (Technical Director) and Dr Edstan Fernandez (Lead Researcher).
Two live sessions: Australia at 2:30 pm GMT+11 and Europe at 2:30 pm GMT+1.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Attendees who complete the survey form will receive their certificate within 2–3 business days.
Survey forms expire within 48 hours after the webinar.
Paid ticket holders who do not complete the survey will still receive the slides and recorded videos.
Paid ticket holders will receive materials within 5–6 business days after the webinar.