

Bias, Trust & Transparency
This session examines how algorithmic bias shows up across the talent lifecycle: in résumé screening that filters out certain zip codes or names, in performance scoring that penalizes non-linear career paths, in pay banding tools that anchor to market data built on inequitable baselines.
Through a practitioner panel and structured case discussion, we'll look at real examples of bias in talent systems: what caused it, who caught it (or didn't), and what organizations are doing to audit for it before it becomes a liability.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
By the end of this session, participants will be able to:
Define algorithmic bias in HR contexts and explain the mechanisms by which AI systems can encode and amplify existing inequities in hiring, performance, and compensation.
Distinguish between disparate impact (outcome-based bias) and disparate treatment (process-based bias) as they apply to AI-driven HR decisions.
Apply a basic bias detection lens to at least one AI-influenced talent process in their organization.
Identify the legal and reputational stakes of unchecked algorithmic bias, including emerging state and local AI employment regulations.
Name two concrete steps their team could take to move from awareness to an inclusive AI audit process.