Before You Trust the Shortlist: A Live Discussion on Choosing AI Observability Tools

​AI agents now read, write, and act on your data. The tools that watch them are a decision you’ll be accountable for, even if you don’t sign the purchase order.

​That decision often starts with a shortlist from an AI assistant. IronSpark Analysis has tracked what ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini recommend when buyers ask about AI observability tools since April and recently published a report. Join our analysts for a live discussion on the findings and what to do about it.

​What we’ll cover

• ​Who owns what. Several of the most-recommended vendors were acquired this year, and the assistants often don’t say so.

• ​Whose voice you’re hearing. About six in ten cited sources are vendors’ own sites.

• ​Watching isn’t controlling. What the role of security and identity is.

• ​Who acts on the warning? How data, AI, and security teams share what they see.

​The panel

• ​Salvatore Salamone, Chief Analyst

• ​Philip Russom, Data and Analytics

• ​Elisabeth Strenger, Open Source and Responsible AI

• ​Joe McKendrick, People and Business Empowerment

• ​Gordon Haff, Hardware, Open Source, and Container Ecosystem

​Moderated by Lisa Damast, Founder, IronSpark Analysis.

​Who should join: data and analytics leaders, heads of AI and data platform, and the security and governance colleagues who weigh in on these purchases.

​Bring your questions. We’ll save time for live Q&A.

​📄 Read the report first: https://www.ironsparkanalysis.com/research/choosing-ai-observability-tools-data-leaders/