​The leaders who survive the next reorg have one thing in common.

​They changed their role before AI changed it for them.

​That gap, between "we use AI tools" and "we run as an AI-native org", is where teams stall, roadmaps stay reactive, and the manager becomes the bottleneck instead of the multiplier.

​At ELC Meetup #42, three leaders from Ataccama, FTMO, and bleeding.dev open up how their own roles, teams, and processes changed. Not slides. What broke, what they kept, what they would do again.

​What we'll cover: Three angles on the same question:

​Zdenek Obst [Ataccama]:

• ​Agentic pods as learning circles, not project teams. The principle of autonomy: what a team can decide without asking, and what changes once it can.

​Jan Vejmola [FTMO]:

• ​AI inside QA and delivery. Where the human stays in the loop, and where it does not.

​Petr Glaser [bleeding.dev]:

• ​The skills map, role by role. Not just engineers, marketing and HR need an AI skill set too, and a manager needs a plan to keep the team healthy while all of this changes under them.

​You leave with a role-to-AI-skill map to hold up against your own org chart, and a shorter list of KPIs worth tracking into 2027.

​This meetup is made possible by Ataccama and FTMO.

​Come with your org chart. Leave with a plan to rewire it.

​You leave with a role-to-AI-skill map to hold up against your own org chart, and a shorter list of KPIs worth tracking into 2027.

​What makes our meetups different:

• ​Action-oriented: Every talk includes takeaway guides/frameworks you can photograph or access via QR code

• ​Case study focused: Real implementations, real results, real failures

• ​Interactive: Audience Q&A with people who have done this

• ​Practical: Skip the vendor pitches—hear from practitioners

​Perfect for engineering leaders tired of AI marketing fluff who want practical insights.